With what is becoming the regular cadence of a daily soap opera, the developments in what has become known as “CIPA law” continue to evolve quickly. 

In the past couple of weeks, we have written on several instances that could impact the litigation posture for any company sued or threated to be sued in California for alleged violations of the both potential legislative action and action in the courts that might provide relief to businesses being sued or threatened to be sued for violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA).

Continue Reading As the CIPA World Turns…

Portions of this blog were also co-authored by Taft Summer Associate Ashley Patriquin.

Businesses that provide a website or online services that collect data from or about minors or children should be aware of expanding legal requirements from U.S. states. These laws impose a range of obligations on businesses, including age estimation requirements, heightened privacy disclosures, limitations on data collection and profiling, and duties to act in the best interests of minors.

State legislatures have also recently begun directly regulating the privacy practices of companies that provide social media solutions to consumers, often with an eye to protecting underage users. Common amongst these new laws are age verification requirements and parental control and consent requirements. Some laws go further, such as requiring ‘deplatforming’ in certain circumstances and restricting ‘shadow banning’ practices. Many of these statutes define “social media” to broadly include any technologies that facilitate interactions among end users and can carry significant penalties for noncompliance.

Below is a summary of certain recent state laws regulating these topics.

Continue Reading Children’s Data & Social Media Privacy Laws

Clients, recent speaking engagements, the explosion of state AI regulation and guidance from financial authorities have all forced me to think and re-think how companies should practically approach their AI governance.

On the one hand, AI-powered tools promise to advance productivity for most tech-powered companies, and most companies find themselves eager to harness the power of these solutions. On the other hand, the regulatory, legal, and reputational risks are increasingly non-trivial, including the potential for private litigation and enforcement, failed customer engagement strategy, and other challenges.

Continue Reading Internalizing AI Governance: The Practical Thinking So Far

We have been writing about the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) for a while now (and, earlier this year, we predicted this law would continue to be a major issue in 2026).

From demand letters flooding our clients’ inboxes to the wave of litigation targeting standard website tracking tools, this 1967 wiretapping statute has proven uniquely susceptible to claims that bear little resemblance to the covert surveillance it was designed to prevent. On July 1, 2026, the California Assembly Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection passed an amended version of Senate Bill 690, and the result is both encouraging and incomplete.

Continue Reading California Legislature Takes Aim at CIPA Abuse

On June 22, 2026, President Trump issued two Executive Orders entitled “Ushering the Next Frontier of Quantum Innovation” (Quantum EO) and “Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks” (Cryptographic EO) demonstrating the increasing focus of the administration on quantum. 

Quantum technology is a rapidly growing technology using quantum-mechanical principles to process data in ways not possible with classical computers. Quantum computers and quantum technologies like photonics and sensors are undergoing significant research and development efforts that will impact every industry. One of the most immediately impactful issues related to quantum computers is their ability to break even the best classical computer encryption protocols. As a result, the United States and many other countries and large companies are dedicating significant funds to quantum research in an effort to ensure the protection of critical encrypted data. Quantum is both an amazing new technology and an imminent security threat.

Continue Reading Quantum Homework for Everyone: New Executive Orders on Quantum Technology

The California Information Privacy Act (CIPA) has become a go‑to vehicle for plaintiffs’ counsel attacking website tracking technologies, such as cookies, pixels, beacons, chat bots, and video or session replay tools.

Over the last few years, website operators have been hit with a wave of demand letters claiming CIPA violations. But the tide may be shifting – marking smoother sailing for website operators. A recent decision from a California court narrows CIPA to telephonic communications and significantly undercuts the viability of CIPA claims against commercial websites.

Continue Reading Changing Tides: A Los Angeles Court Delivers a Major CIPA Defense Win

Last week, I had the pleasure of taking the main stage at CincyAI Week in Cincinnati, Ohio to talk with entrepreneurs, business leaders, academics, and artificial intelligence enthusiasts about the current state of AI policy, privacy, and compliance across the United States.

Here are the key takeaways from the presentation.

Continue Reading The State of AI Policy, Privacy, and Compliance in the United States

On June 4, 2026, Representatives Jay Obernolte and Lori Trahan released a discussion draft of the Great American Artificial Intelligence Act of 2026 (GAAIA). The GAAIA is the latest federal attempt at timely and coherent technology-based regulations.

This bill, however, takes a notably different approach. Narrow enough to be effective, GAAIA sidesteps the pitfalls that have plagued federal privacy law efforts by limiting scope and preemption. Not yet formally introduced, this nearly 270-page discussion draft seems to mostly target the big players (the large AI companies building foundational AI models) and is centered around transparency and innovation.

This article covers the key provisions of GAAIA, what organizations are actually in the crosshairs, and how it fits alongside the June 2nd Executive Order related to artificial intelligence.

Continue Reading The Great American Artificial Intelligence Act: An Attempt to Federally Regulate AI

Connecticut’s Governor Ned Lamont announced on May 29, 2026 that he had ratified sweeping artificial intelligence legislation in Senate Bill 5, titled “An Act Concerning Online Safety.” The law is unique in its breadth among the growing list of state AI laws, in that it regulates several distinct applications or categories of AI.

Specifically, the law addresses: 1) subscription-based AI services; 2) frontier AI models; 3) automated employment-related decision technology; 4) AI companions; and 5) AI in social media. Below, we summarize certain requirements pertaining to each regulated topic.

Continue Reading Connecticut Enacts Sweeping AI Legislation

In February 2026, a public-private partnership headed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury concluded an investigative process aimed at strengthening cybersecurity and risk mitigation for AI in the financial services sector.

The partnership consisted of executives from over 100 financial institutions, U.S. and international agencies, federal and state financial regulators, and other key stakeholders. One of the partnership’s key deliverables announced at the conclusion of the investigation is the Financial Services AI Risk Management Framework (Financial Services AI RMF), which adopts and expands the AI Risk Management Framework provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST Framework) for specific application to the financial services industry.

Continue Reading Financial Services AI Risk Management Framework: Expanded Controls for the Financial Services Industry