Under new regulations effective January 1, 2026, California regulators now expect businesses to conduct an annual “cybersecurity audit” that assesses “how the business’s cybersecurity program protects personal information from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure; and protects against unauthorized activity resulting in the loss of availability of personal information.”

Now is the time to prepare for these requirements.

As explained below, these requirements are detailed and contemplate a rigorous, professional, independent, evidence-based audit. Audit results must be shared with the California regulator under penalty of perjury.

Continue Reading Understanding California Cyber Audit Requirements

Under newly implemented regulations of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), California now requires a formal risk assessment “before initiating any processing activity” of certain (sensitive) sorts. The regulation explicitly contemplates that businesses will complete risk assessments now, in 2026.

Eventually, such risk assessments – including those completed this year – must be signed by an executive and submitted to the California regulator under penalty of perjury.

Continue Reading New CCPA Risk Assessment Requirements Now In Effect

As in Indiana and Kentucky, the start of 2026 brought into effect Rhode Island’s comprehensive consumer privacy law, the Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA). This statute is not simply a replica of what has come before it.

While much of its terminology and mechanics will feel familiar to organizations already operating under multiple state privacy regimes, it also includes elements such as general applicability thresholds at the lower end of the typical range and broad privacy notice requirements. The similarities and distinctions make RIDTPPA easy to place within the broader U.S. privacy landscape, while also presenting a few compliance gray areas that merit closer attention.

Continue Reading Rhode Island’s New Privacy Law: An Overview and Highlighted Differences

Enforcement activity surged in 2025, with landmark judgments and settlements—some reaching eight and nine figures—targeting issues such as ad tracking, analytics, wiretapping, text messaging, data subject rights, and sensitive data collection. This aggressive trend shows no signs of slowing as we move into 2026.

Taft continues to help its clients find the correct answers in their context for addressing these risks. Building on our year-end post, here are some issues you may want to consider as you take on the new year.

Continue Reading Your 2026 Privacy, Security, and Artificial Intelligence Checklist

As we begin 2026, Kentucky has officially enacted the Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act (KCDPA), a comprehensive privacy statute that took effect on January 1, 2026. As with Indiana, is KCDPA is modeled on the now‑familiar Virginia‑style framework. The KCDPA establishes consumer data rights, imposes governance obligations on businesses, and grants exclusive enforcement authority to the Kentucky Attorney General.

Continue Reading Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act: Key Takeaways for the New Bluegrass Statute

Indiana has joined the growing list of states with a comprehensive consumer privacy statute, codified at Indiana Code 24‑15 and effective January 1, 2026.

The law follows the “Virginia model,” but introduces several nuances that will matter for organizations doing business in, or targeting residents of, Indiana.

Continue Reading HOO- HOO- HOO- HOOSIERS Brace for Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act

President Trump’s Dec. 11, Executive Order, “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence” (the “order”), targets what the administration views as burdensome and fragmented state AI regulation in favor of a single national framework.

Although the order does not overturn any existing or proposed state AI law, it directs federal agencies to challenge certain state AI laws, condition federal funding on compliance with the order, and propose federal preemption legislation.

Continue Reading President Trump Signs Executive Order to Limit State AI Regulation

As 2025 comes to a close, we asked several members of Taft’s Privacy and Data Security practice group to share their thoughts on what should be on a client’s “wish list” for the holiday season, or on a list of resolutions for 2026.

Here are their thoughts for businesses considering to not only meet the requirements of new laws and mitigate existing risks, but also looking to seize the opportunity to maximize the impact of technology to unleash the power in their data.

Continue Reading Closing Out 2025: Key Privacy & Data Security Updates from Taft

State regulators are increasingly prioritizing children’s data privacy. These efforts follow several changes to protect children’s online privacy at the federal level. One of the latest sweep of changes involve several states (e.g., California, Louisiana, Texas and Utah) imposing app store accountability laws (ASA Laws).

These new laws require app store operators (e.g., Apple and Google) along with app developers to implement safeguards for age verification, age rating, parental consent and data minimization. While the aim of these laws is to protect children, the obligations imposed on businesses apply broadly, regardless of the age of an app’s users. For businesses with mobile apps, these safeguards are not optional. They are mandatory to keep  apps available for download.

While the ASA Laws slightly vary in their respective requirements, a general overview of what businesses should know is below.

Continue Reading New App Store Accountability Laws in 2026: If Your Business Has an App, Read On